Gardening for Brain Health: The Biology of Food Security

Why Does Early Food Security Education Matter for Child Development?

Early food security education changes what kids notice, what they value, and what their bodies learn to expect. When children grow even a small portion of their food, they build a practical mental model of how food becomes available. That model reduces anxiety around scarcity, increases willingness to try vegetables, and creates a daily routine of care that strengthens executive function.

It also influences biology. Childhood is a sensitive period for metabolic programming and brain development. Repeated exposure to fiber rich plants, mineral dense greens, and fermented foods can shape gut microbial communities. Those microbes then manufacture signaling molecules that communicate with immune cells, endocrine tissues, and the developing nervous system. In plain terms, early food security education is not only character building. It is also chemistry and biology training for a young body.

The research is consistent that food insecurity during preschool years is associated with deficits across multiple developmental domains, including social emotional skill development and self regulation. But the inverse matters too. When kids experience food as something they can help create, they tend to eat more plants, practice more sustained effort, and gain a calmer sense of control. Those behavioral changes often become biological changes through diet driven shifts in microbial metabolism and through stress pathway regulation.

This guide expands the “how” at the molecular level, especially the chemical signaling chain that runs from soil microbes to plant chemistry to the human gut microbiome and then into metabolic pathways and neurological development.

The Neurobiology of Food Security Awareness in Developing Brains

The human brain develops rapidly between birth and age five. During these years, neural circuits are shaped by experience dependent plasticity, meaning repeated experiences physically reinforce synapses and networks. Food security education works in this window because it is repetitive, sensory rich, and tied to meaningful outcomes. Kids see a seed, touch soil, smell herbs, watch leaves change, and then eat the result. That loop is a powerful teacher for the developing nervous system.

When a child plants a seed, tends it daily, and harvests edible produce, multiple systems activate at once. Prefrontal networks support planning and inhibitory control as the child follows a routine and resists the urge to over water or to pull seedlings too early. Hippocampal networks support episodic memory and spatial learning as the child remembers where plants are, what was planted, and what happened last week. Amygdala centered threat and salience circuits learn that effort can lead to predictable reward, and that uncertainty can be tolerated because the environment is stable enough to support growth.

Food security education also engages interoception, the brain’s mapping of internal body states. When kids connect “I ate greens” with “my stomach feels good” or “I drank water after gardening” with “I feel calmer,” the insula and related networks build a stronger association between body cues and choices. Over time, that can support better self regulation around eating and stress.

How stress chemistry and food security experiences interact

Food insecurity is not only a social condition. It is also a biological stressor. Chronic uncertainty increases allostatic load, the cumulative wear on stress response systems. In children, repeated activation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis can influence appetite regulation, sleep quality, and immune tone. Elevated or dysregulated cortisol signaling can shift energy partitioning toward fat storage and can change how the brain responds to reward cues, including highly processed foods that deliver fast dopamine reinforcement.

Hands on food production can counter this in two ways.

First, it creates predictable routines. Predictability reduces stress signaling. Regular watering, checking leaves, and harvesting are small but consistent cycles that teach the nervous system that effort maps to outcome.

Second, it shifts dietary patterns toward fiber rich plant foods. That matters because gut microbes convert dietary fiber into short chain fatty acids that signal through immune and endocrine pathways and can influence neuroinflammation and neurotransmitter precursor availability.

Dopamine, effort, and earned reward

Gardening provides moderate dopamine reinforcement spread across time. Sprouting, first true leaves, flowering, and harvest are spaced rewards. This encourages persistence and supports the maturation of executive control systems that are needed for school readiness. Unlike instant entertainment stimuli, the reinforcement is coupled to real world contingencies. The child learns that small daily actions compound.

Experience that turns into biology

Repeated food security activities become biology through learned behavior. A child who regularly eats plants tends to deliver regular substrates to microbial fermentation pathways. That results in more consistent production of microbial metabolites, which become chemical signals interacting with immune cells, vagal afferents, enteroendocrine cells, and the blood brain barrier. Those signals, in turn, can influence sleep quality, emotional reactivity, and attention stability.

Metabolic Programming Through Early Nutritional Experiences

The foods children eat in early life do more than supply calories. They help set baseline metabolic expectations. Researchers often describe this as metabolic programming, where early inputs influence long term regulation of appetite, insulin sensitivity, lipid handling, inflammatory tone, and even mitochondrial function.

At the molecular level, early nutrition influences gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms. DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications, and non coding RNA expression respond to dietary inputs and can persist, changing how tissues respond to the same environment later in life. A childhood pattern that includes diverse plants, adequate protein, minerals, and omega fatty acids tends to support healthier metabolic flexibility, meaning the body can shift between glucose and fat oxidation without exaggerated stress signaling.

Freshly harvested produce can strengthen that pattern because it delivers higher levels of labile nutrients and intact phytochemicals. Vitamin C and folate are classic examples of compounds that degrade with time and storage conditions. But the broader issue is that many plant defense and signaling compounds are highest when plants are harvested ripe and eaten quickly. These compounds matter because they interact with human xenobiotic sensing pathways and microbial metabolism.

The gut microbiome as a metabolic organ

The gut microbiome behaves like a chemical factory attached to the digestive tract. Its outputs include short chain fatty acids, secondary bile acid metabolites, indoles from tryptophan, phenolic metabolites from polyphenols, and neurotransmitter relevant compounds. The main levers kids can control are dietary pattern, variety, fiber type, and consistency.

When a child eats a range of plant fibers, gut bacteria ferment those carbohydrates in the colon. This fermentation generates short chain fatty acids.

Acetate enters peripheral circulation and can be used in lipid synthesis or as a substrate in energy metabolism.

Propionate can influence hepatic gluconeogenesis and satiety signaling.

Butyrate is a key energy source for colonocytes and supports intestinal barrier integrity by increasing tight junction protein expression and mucin production.

A stronger barrier reduces translocation of pro inflammatory microbial components into circulation, lowering immune activation that can interfere with insulin signaling.

Short chain fatty acids also bind to G protein coupled receptors such as FFAR2 and FFAR3 on enteroendocrine and immune cells. This affects secretion of hormones like GLP one and PYY, which influence appetite, gastric motility, and insulin dynamics. In childhood, when appetite signaling networks are still being calibrated, these microbial driven endocrine signals can help shape a steadier satiety response.

Microbial metabolites and brain development

The developing brain is sensitive to inflammatory signals and to nutrient availability. Gut microbial metabolites can influence neurodevelopment through several routes.

Immune modulation. Reduced systemic inflammation lowers microglial activation. Microglia guide synaptic pruning and circuit refinement. Excess inflammatory signaling can push microglia toward an activated state that may alter pruning patterns.

Vagal signaling. Enteroendocrine cells and immune cells can stimulate vagal afferents, which project into brainstem nuclei that influence mood and arousal regulation.

Tryptophan metabolism. Microbes shift tryptophan toward indole derivatives or toward kynurenine pathway metabolites. The balance can influence availability of serotonin precursors and immune modulating ligands that interact with aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling.

Barrier integrity. A healthier gut barrier reduces exposure to lipopolysaccharide like components that can increase cytokine production. Cytokines can cross or signal across the blood brain barrier and influence neurotransmission and neuroplasticity.

This is one reason early food security education can have neurological effects that are not just “learning mindset.” If kids eat more plants because they grew them, microbial fermentation and metabolite profiles shift. Those metabolites participate in endocrine, immune, and neural signaling.

Why growing food changes what kids eat

The most reliable outcome of kids growing food is increased willingness to taste and repeat exposure. Repeated exposure matters because taste preference is trainable. Each extra serving of plants per week is extra substrate for microbial pathways that produce beneficial metabolites. The habit becomes a steady input stream, and steady inputs produce steady outputs.

The Socio-Biological Impact of Agricultural Responsibility

When children take responsibility for living organisms, they develop an internal locus of control, the belief that actions influence outcomes. This matters psychologically, but it also matters biologically because perceived control is a stress buffer. Lower chronic stress signaling supports healthier sleep, steadier appetite regulation, and improved immune balance. In childhood, stress buffering can indirectly shape metabolic pathways by reducing cortisol driven shifts in glucose handling and reward seeking behavior.

Consider the biological reality of what occurs when a child is responsible for a plant. The child must observe, assess needs, and respond.

If the soil surface looks dry, water might be needed.

If leaves pale, nitrogen or iron availability might be limiting chlorophyll synthesis.

If stems bend, mechanical support and light placement matter.

Each of these assessments strengthens circuits associated with causal reasoning and planning.

Where the soil microbiome connects to the human microbiome

Responsibility in gardening also introduces kids to soil as a living system. This is where the soil microbe to human gut microbe story becomes concrete.

Soil contains bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and archaea. Plants recruit specific members of this community through root exudates, a mixture of sugars, amino acids, organic acids, phenolics, and signaling molecules. That recruited community influences plant nutrient uptake and the plant’s internal chemistry. The plant then becomes the food, carrying a chemical and microbial fingerprint into the kitchen.

This does not mean children should eat soil. It means the plant plus the environment around it shapes what ends up on the plate. Washing produce reduces microbial load, but plant chemistry remains. Some microbes on plants also survive to become transient passengers in the gut, interacting with resident microbes. More importantly, plant metabolites shaped by soil microbial interactions become substrates for gut microbial metabolism.

A clear chain of chemical signals

Soil microbes influence plant chemistry through multiple mechanisms.

Mycorrhizal fungi expand the effective root surface area and change phosphorus acquisition. Adequate phosphorus supports ATP synthesis and membrane phospholipid production, which influences plant growth rate and leaf nutrient density.

Rhizobacteria can produce phytohormones like indole three acetic acid like compounds, affecting root architecture. Root architecture changes exudate patterns and nutrient uptake.

Some bacteria produce ACC deaminase, reducing plant ethylene stress signaling. Lower stress signaling can shift plant carbon allocation, affecting fiber composition and phenolic profiles.

Microbes also influence plant defense chemistry. When microbes prime plant immunity, plants may increase production of phenolics, terpenes, glucosinolates, and other secondary metabolites. Those compounds become part of human diet and are metabolized by gut microbes into smaller signaling molecules.

In the gut, those metabolites can act as ligands for receptors that influence inflammation, antioxidant response, and barrier integrity. For example, certain polyphenol metabolites can activate pathways related to Nrf two mediated antioxidant responses. Some indole derivatives from plant and microbial metabolism interact with aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling, supporting mucosal immune balance.

Why this matters for neurological development

Immune balance and barrier integrity matter for brain development because cytokines and inflammatory mediators influence neuronal growth factors and microglial state. Short chain fatty acids, indoles, and bile acid metabolites can influence tight junctions, immune differentiation, and vagal signaling. That affects sleep, mood stability, and attention regulation.

So in a practical family context, agricultural responsibility can reduce stress and improve diet quality, while the soil microbe plant metabolite gut microbe pathway provides a mechanistic bridge to metabolic and neurological outcomes.

Learning math and language still matters

The socio educational benefits remain real and measurable. Children who participate in food production often strengthen mathematical reasoning through measuring growth, tracking days to harvest, and estimating yields. Language development improves through precise vocabulary and explanation practice. Social development strengthens in shared garden work through coordination, turn taking, and celebrating harvest.

The biological reality of seasonal cycles still teaches timing, limits, and renewal. Even indoor systems have cycles. Plants bolt, nutrient solutions change, compost matures, and seeds have dormancy patterns. Those rhythms teach systems thinking, which is a core skill for sustainability and for long term problem solving.

Molecular Nutrition and Phytochemical Education for Young Minds

The molecular complexity of plant foods provides exceptional opportunities for science education that most curricula overlook. When children grow vegetables, they can learn about the actual molecular machinery that transforms sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide into the nutrients that fuel human bodies. This is not abstract biochemistry. This is observable reality that children can engage with directly.

Photosynthesis, the fundamental process by which plants convert light energy into chemical energy, becomes tangible when children observe seedlings reaching toward light sources. The chlorophyll molecules that capture photons, the electron transport chains that convert light energy into ATP, and the Calvin cycle that fixes carbon dioxide into glucose are all occurring in real time in plants children tend. While young children need not master the complete biochemistry, they can grasp the fundamental concept that plants build themselves from air, water, and light through chemical reactions they can observe.

The phytochemical diversity of edible plants provides endless teaching opportunities. Anthocyanins, the purple pigments in purple basil and red cabbage, are powerful antioxidants that protect plant cells from damage. Children can observe these compounds visibly when they make red cabbage pH indicator experiments, watching anthocyanins change color in response to acids and bases. This single activity connects plant biology, chemistry, and human nutrition in an unforgettable hands on experience.

Glucosinolates, sulfur containing compounds abundant in broccoli, kale, and other brassicas, provide another excellent molecular teaching opportunity. These compounds give cruciferous vegetables their characteristic sharp flavors and provide significant anti cancer properties in human diets. When children taste the "bite" of fresh arugula or radishes, they are experiencing glucosinolates directly. Learning that these somewhat challenging flavors represent powerful protective compounds helps children develop more positive relationships with nutritious but initially unfamiliar foods.

Carotenoids, the orange and yellow pigments in carrots, sweet potatoes, and winter squash, demonstrate how molecular structure determines both color and biological function. Beta carotene, the orange pigment in carrots, converts into vitamin A in human bodies, supporting vision, immune function, and cell growth. Children can observe carotenoids accumulating as tomatoes ripen from green to red, as peppers transition from green to yellow to red, and as winter squash develops its characteristic deep orange flesh.

Essential oils in herbs like basil, mint, and cilantro introduce children to volatile organic compounds and their biological functions. These aromatic molecules serve as plant defenses against herbivores and pathogens, but humans experience them as pleasant flavors and aromas. When children crush fresh basil leaves and smell the released essential oils, they are experiencing terpenes, a class of organic compounds with diverse biological activities. This sensory experience connects chemistry, plant defense strategies, and culinary applications in immediate and memorable ways.

The nitrogen cycle, fundamental to all agriculture, becomes comprehensible when children observe the effects of nitrogen availability on plant growth. Nitrogen deficient plants show characteristic yellowing of older leaves as the plant mobilizes nitrogen from mature tissues to support new growth. When children add compost or nitrogen rich amendments and observe the greening of previously chlorotic leaves, they witness nitrogen biochemistry in action. They learn that nitrogen atoms cycle from atmosphere to soil bacteria to plant proteins to human bodies and eventually back to soil, an endless molecular journey essential to all life.

The Neurological Architecture of Responsibility and Consequence

Responsibility is not an abstract moral virtue that adults teach through lectures and rules. Responsibility is a neurological capacity that develops through repeated experiences of cause and effect, particularly when the consequences of actions are clear, consistent, and personally meaningful. Agricultural education provides an ideal framework for developing this neurological architecture during the critical years of early childhood.

When a child forgets to water plants and observes wilting leaves the next day, specific brain regions activate in response to this cause and effect relationship. The anterior cingulate cortex, which detects conflicts between intended actions and actual outcomes, registers the mismatch between the goal of healthy plants and the reality of drought stress. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, involved in planning and decision making, encodes the lesson that neglect produces negative outcomes. The orbital frontal cortex, which processes reward and punishment, associates watering with positive outcomes and neglect with negative outcomes.

Crucially, these neurological lessons occur without adult punishment or artificial consequences. The child does not receive a lecture about responsibility. The child experiences the natural consequence of their actions directly. This form of learning creates far more robust and lasting neural pathways than externally imposed consequences ever could. The brain is evolutionarily designed to learn from natural consequences, and agricultural education leverages this innate learning mechanism.

The consistency of agricultural consequences provides another neurological advantage. Unlike many domains of childhood where rules seem arbitrary and consequences inconsistent, plants respond to care or neglect with absolute reliability. Water them, they thrive. Neglect them, they suffer. This consistency allows the developing brain to build clear cause and effect models without the confusion that inconsistent consequences create.

The temporal structure of agricultural responsibility also provides unique neurological benefits. Unlike instant consequence activities, gardening requires sustained effort over days, weeks, and months. Seeds do not sprout immediately. Seedlings do not mature overnight. This extended timeframe teaches the developing brain to maintain goal directed behavior over long periods, inhibiting impulses for immediate gratification in service of delayed rewards. These are precisely the executive function skills that predict academic success, career achievement, and healthy relationships throughout life.

As children advance in their agricultural education, they begin to anticipate needs rather than simply responding to visible problems. They check soil moisture before wilting occurs. They provide structural support before stems break. They harvest at optimal ripeness rather than waiting until vegetables become overripe. This transition from reactive to proactive care represents a significant neurological development. The child's brain begins to simulate future states, plan preemptive actions, and execute complex sequences of behavior in service of long term goals.

Practical Implementation: Creating Food Security Education Systems at Home

Understanding the theoretical benefits of agricultural education means little without practical implementation strategies. Fortunately, modern technology and educational resources make it remarkably straightforward to establish effective food growing systems in homes regardless of outdoor space availability.

Indoor hydroponic systems represent perhaps the most reliable and educational approach for families new to food production. These systems eliminate many variables that make traditional soil gardening challenging: inconsistent moisture, poor soil quality, pest pressure, and seasonal limitations. A quality hydroponic system provides complete control over light, nutrients, water, and environmental conditions, allowing year round production of fresh vegetables even in apartments without outdoor access.

When selecting a hydroponic system for educational purposes, prioritize visibility and child accessibility. Vertical tower systems allow children to observe root development, monitor water levels, and harvest produce at eye level. Transparent or semi transparent reservoirs let children see nutrient solution and understand the water delivery mechanisms. Systems with built in LED grow lights teach children about light spectra and photosynthetic efficiency while providing optimal growing conditions.

The nutritional advantages of indoor hydroponics deserve emphasis. Hydroponically grown lettuce, herbs, and greens reach harvest maturity in 25 to 40 days rather than the 60 to 80 days typical of soil growing. This accelerated growth cycle maintains engagement for children with shorter attention spans while providing rapid feedback on care practices. Nutrient solution formulations deliver optimal mineral ratios, producing vegetables with superior nutritional profiles compared to soil grown equivalents facing nutrient deficiencies or imbalances.

For families with outdoor space, raised bed systems offer additional educational opportunities while maintaining many benefits of controlled environment growing. Raised beds filled with quality soil mix eliminate concerns about native soil contamination, compaction, or poor drainage. The defined borders make spatial planning and crop rotation easier for children to understand. Elevating growing surfaces brings plants closer to child height, improving accessibility and reducing the need for children to kneel or bend.

Companion planting in raised beds teaches children about plant relationships and ecological interactions. The classic "three sisters" combination of corn, beans, and squash demonstrates mutualism: corn provides support for climbing beans, beans fix nitrogen that feeds corn and squash, and squash leaves shade soil while deterring pests. Children can observe these relationships directly and learn that plant communities function differently than isolated individuals.

Succession planting, the practice of planting small quantities every few weeks rather than all at once, teaches children about sustained harvest and continuous food production. Rather than overwhelming abundance followed by scarcity, succession planting provides steady yields throughout the growing season. This practice also introduces concepts of planning, scheduling, and resource management.

Composting systems provide exceptional educational value for teaching children about nutrient cycles, decomposition, and soil ecology. A simple three bin system allows children to add kitchen scraps and garden waste, observe microbial decomposition transforming waste into rich compost, and apply finished compost to growing beds. The visible transformation of garbage into valuable soil amendment demonstrates circular resource flows and challenges linear "take, make, dispose" thinking.

At the molecular level, composting teaches children about carbon to nitrogen ratios, microbial respiration, and the chemical transformations that occur during decomposition. Brown materials like dried leaves provide carbon for microbial energy. Green materials like vegetable scraps provide nitrogen for microbial growth. The heat generated during active composting demonstrates the energy release from microbial respiration. The rich, earthy smell of finished compost comes from geosmin and other volatile organic compounds produced by actinobacteria. Every aspect of composting provides molecular science education opportunities.

Seed starting with children deserves particular attention because it directly demonstrates the remarkable biology of plant reproduction and development. When a child places a seed in moist growing medium and observes the emergence of a radicle, hypocotyl, and cotyledons, they witness one of nature's most fundamental processes. The fact that a hard, dry seed contains all the genetic information and stored energy needed to produce an entire plant is genuinely astonishing when children take time to observe it closely.

Different seed types provide different educational opportunities. Large seeds like beans, peas, and squash allow children to easily observe seed structure and germination stages. Fast germinating seeds like radishes and lettuce provide quick results that maintain engagement. Unusual seeds like okra with hard seed coats demonstrate seed dormancy mechanisms and the value of scarification. Tiny seeds like carrots and lettuce teach precision and fine motor skills during planting.

Long Term Outcomes: Tracking Developmental Advantages into Adolescence and Adulthood

The true test of early food security education lies not in immediate outcomes but in long term developmental trajectories. Fortunately, longitudinal research now provides substantial evidence that early agricultural exposure and nutrition education produce measurable advantages persisting well beyond childhood.

Children with consistent food growing experience during preschool and elementary years demonstrate superior academic performance in middle school and high school. This advantage appears across subjects, not just science. Mathematics performance benefits from the quantitative reasoning developed through measuring, spacing, and yield calculations. Language skills benefit from the rich vocabulary and descriptive practice inherent in agricultural observation. Social studies understanding benefits from connections between agriculture, geography, economics, and history.

Perhaps most significantly, early agricultural education predicts enhanced executive function in adolescence. Executive function, encompassing working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility, represents the cognitive infrastructure underlying academic achievement, social competence, and emotional regulation. Adolescents with childhood agricultural experience show superior planning abilities, better impulse control, and greater capacity for perspective taking compared to peers without such experience.

The metabolic programming benefits of early nutrition become increasingly apparent as children reach adolescence and early adulthood. Individuals who consumed diverse, nutrient dense, freshly harvested produce during childhood show reduced rates of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and inflammatory markers in young adulthood. They demonstrate healthier eating patterns, greater vegetable consumption, and lower intake of ultra processed foods compared to individuals without early nutritional advantages.

The psychological benefits of early responsibility and agency manifest in adolescent mental health outcomes. Teenagers who developed strong internal locus of control through childhood agricultural experience show lower rates of depression and anxiety. They demonstrate greater resilience in the face of setbacks and challenges. They report higher life satisfaction and more optimistic future orientations. These psychological advantages emerge directly from the neurological frameworks established through years of caring for plants and experiencing clear cause and effect relationships.

Career trajectories also reflect early agricultural education impacts. Young adults with childhood food growing experience disproportionately pursue careers in environmental science, sustainable agriculture, public health, nutrition, and education. But even those pursuing unrelated careers report that agricultural experiences shaped their work ethic, problem solving approaches, and understanding of systems thinking. The ability to maintain sustained effort toward long term goals, tolerate uncertainty, and learn from failure all trace back to lessons learned through agricultural responsibility.

Conclusion: The Biological Mandate for Food Security Education

The evidence converges from multiple scientific disciplines: neuroscience, nutrition science, developmental psychology, molecular biology, and educational research all support the conclusion that early food security education provides profound and lasting developmental advantages. This is not a lifestyle preference or parenting trend. This is a biological imperative grounded in how human brains develop, how metabolic systems establish themselves, and how children learn responsibility and agency.

When we teach children about food security through direct agricultural participation, we activate fundamental neurological and biological processes that evolution designed to respond to such experiences. We leverage the brain's natural capacity for learning through cause and effect. We program metabolic systems during critical windows of development. We establish psychological frameworks of responsibility and agency that govern behavior for decades to come.

The practical accessibility of modern food growing systems removes traditional barriers to implementation. Families do not need farms or large yards to provide these developmental advantages to their children. Indoor hydroponic systems, raised bed gardens, container plantings, and even microgreen trays on kitchen counters all provide opportunities for children to participate in food production and experience the neurological and metabolic benefits such participation creates.

For families seeking comprehensive resources on implementing food security education at home, Tierney Family Farms provides detailed guides, project ideas, and practical strategies for growing food with children. From seed starting experiments to indoor microgreens production, the platform offers evidence based approaches for integrating agricultural education into family life.

The biological and neurological imperative is clear: early food security education shapes developing brains, programs metabolic systems, and establishes psychological frameworks that influence health and success throughout life. The question is not whether to provide such education but how quickly we can implement it for the next generation.

References

1. Coleman-Jensen, A., Rabbitt, M. P., Gregory, C. A., & Singh, A. (2024). Household Food Security in the United States in 2023. USDA Economic Research Service.

2. Kirkpatrick, S. I., McIntyre, L., & Potestio, M. L. (2010). Child hunger and long term adverse consequences for health. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(8), 754-762.

3. Metallinos-Katsaras, E., Sherry, B., & Kallio, J. (2009). Food insecurity is associated with overweight in children younger than 5 years of age. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(10), 1790-1794.

4. Jimenez-Cruz, A., Bacardi-Gascon, M., & Spindler, A. A. (2003). Obesity and hunger among Mexican-Indian migrant children on the US-Mexico border. International Journal of Obesity, 27(6), 740-747.

5. Holben, D. H., & Marshall, M. B. (2017). Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Food Insecurity in the United States. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 117(12), 1991-2002.

6. Rose-Jacobs, R., Black, M. M., Casey, P. H., Cook, J. T., Cutts, D. B., Chilton, M., ... & Frank, D. A. (2008). Household food insecurity: associations with at-risk infant and toddler development. Pediatrics, 121(1), 65-72.